CBS 60 Minutes – The Electronic Wasteland

I read or saw something one or two years ago about how shipping containers of electronic waste from the U.S. were shipped to China where Chinese laborers without any kind of protection were stripping the waste down to parts from which the precious metals could be retrieved and recycled.  It was and is against the law to ship this scrap out of the U.S. so some unscrupulous types were amassing loads of scrap to ship to China where more unscrupulous types would buy it and have the various devices/parts stripped down by poor Chinese laborers who were not aware of the health and environmental risks posed.

Since I have, through work, disposed of 15 to 20 thousand pounds of electronic parts over the last four years, I have tried to ensure that the product was disposed of and/or recycled in an environmentally safe manner that did not involve some poor uneducated laborer in a third-world country.  Unfortunately, I can only do so much.  I quiz my recyclers about where the scrap goes after they separate it and sell it to their business partners.  I have been told that they carefully screen those business partners to ensure that they are being as ecologically and humanly friendly as I wish them to be.  The bottom line is that once the scrap is out of your hands, you lose control and really have no idea where it goes.

Watch the clip from CBS.  Apparently, even after an expose one to two years ago, shenigans are still going on.  I wonder what really happened to the scrap I have disposed of through the years:

The Electronic Wasteland

Time to Return to Our Roots

In the Washington Post OpEd, “End of the Open Road -The Land of the Perpetual Frontier Meets $4-a-Gallon Gas,” dated 23 June, 2008, by Bill McKibben, Mr. McKibben discusses a few of the impacts of the high price of oil: automobile use is down, airlines are cutting routes, food costs are higher, and more people are gardening, presumably, growing vegetables. He notes that “local farmers markets are the fastest growing part of the food economy” and “in many areas the number of small farms is on the rise for the first time in a century.”

I have been thinking for years that I would like to get out of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Ideally, I’d like to relocate to Upstate New York or Vermont. I would like to live in a smaller community where we provide more for ourselves rather than relying on huge chains of grocery and department stores to which goods have to be shipped from the four corners of the globe. We, as humans and communities, have to become more self-reliant and less dependent on “world-trade.”

I don’t have the sources immediately at hand to prove what I am about to say but, though it may not happen in my generation or the next, fossil fuels will soon become so scarce and so expensive that the mobile life we now know, be it in our own cars or in planes, trains, and ships for vacation or transportation of goods, will not exist. We may be able to maintain some semblance of the life we currently know through nuclear, solar, wind, tidal, and geothermal power but that is likely to provide power only for homes, businesses, and telecommunication systems…not transportation. Accordingly, we will have to be able to provide sustenance for ourselves and each other locally and regionally.

The bottom line for me is that beginning next year…should have started this year…I will try to grow some of my own vegetables wherever I might find myself. And if I have more than I can use, I’d be glad to trade them for some local product or service that someone else can provide for me.

Food for Thought, If You Can Afford It…

As I am sure everyone is aware, the price of most food items is rising. This is due to few issues, none of which I believe, are easily remedied.

U.S. and EU countries unreasonably subsidize agriculture operations including those that make $150,000 per year. Asian countries countries with recently booming economies such as India and China are increasingly consuming more meat, rice, and soy products. Poor harvests in Europe and Australia compounded by Russian satellite states such as Kazakhstan banning exports have made wheat that much more scarce.

U.S. farmers are producing less wheat due to “climate change” and the fact that wheat is more susceptible to disease than corn. More corn is being produced due to “climate change” and the fact that the price has risen dramatically due to the demand for fuels such as ethanol that emit less carbon dioxide when burned for energy. The growing of corn for bio-fuels is also largely subsidized by the U.S. government, again artificially increasing the desirability of growing corn and, unfortunately also, increasing the price of products based on the consumption of corn such as many meats and milk.

Due largely to government mismanagement of agricultural research to increase crop yields and of continual agricultural subsidies, many countries haven’t increased there crop yields per acre in years. The Philippines reportedly can’t even grow enough rice to feed their own people let alone export it. Top that off with an official policy against birth control and you have a dramatically increasing population and not enough rice to feed it.

My last note for the day will touch on the fact that contenders from both parties for the presidency have suggested that the government suspend the gasoline and diesel fuel taxes for the summer, “Truckers Rally to Protest High Costs for Fuel.” Now there’s a fucking brilliant idea. We are in enough trouble as it is with our national debt…let’s cut taxes some more. Where is the benefit? The price is likely to rise enough to cover any reduction incurred by eliminating the tax. And finally, why should we reward people for driving more at less cost all the while producing more pollutants?

Turkey, a Great Example of a Democratic Islamic Republic

The Washington Post article, “Ban on Head Scarves Voted Out in Turkey, Parliament Lifts 80-Year-Old Restriction on University Attire,” by Zehra Ayman and Ellen Knickmeyer, dated February 10, 2008, gives me the profound impression that there is a chance for democracy and human rights in the Middle East.

As envisioned by the founder of modern Turkey , Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey would be secular. A strong military influence from all levels of society and government has, until recently, ensured that religion would play a minor influence in the daily lives and government of Turks.

While there has alway been a rebellion against these policies, it is has been only in the past five to ten years that this Islamic activism has gained a foothold in society and in government. Considering recent events in the Middle East and Islamic strongholds elsewhere, this should come as no surprise.

According to the article, a burgeoning middle-class is becoming more religious and apparently more influential on the ground. This surprises me in some ways since, according to the western media, the lower-classes in the Middle East are more likely to turn to and accept religion as a vehicle of change.

Either way, my spin on this is as follows. Who cares if an individual wants to wear a scarf out in public? I admit to being a bit freaked by Burhkas but come on. She could be ugly, she could be pretty, or should could be a he. What are you going to do? Wearing a Burhka probably doesn’t make it any easier to smuggle in a suicide bomb than wearing a long skirt or coat does.

I am glad that Turks are comfortable enough in what seems to be the most democratic, Western leaning country in the Middle East to electively shoot down a law that really had no place in the modern world.